Strategy & Governance

Managed Security

Cyber Defense

Governance, Risk & Compliance

Operations & People

Talk to us

Governance, Risk & Compliance

FedRAMP is an authorisation, and somebody has to sponsor it.

A FedRAMP readiness consultant is worth hiring for one conversation before any others: whether you have a path to authorisation at all. FedRAMP is not a certificate you can buy on your own schedule. It is an authorisation granted for a specific cloud service offering, assessed by an accredited Third Party Assessment Organisation, and it requires an agency sponsor or a route through the FedRAMP programme office. Without that path, control work is a capital project with no completion date.

We are not a 3PAO, and we will not pretend that preparation and independent assessment are the same job. What we do is define the authorisation boundary, implement the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls for your baseline, write a System Security Plan that describes the service as built, and get the evidence into a state where the 3PAO assessment produces findings you already knew about.

The baselines are substantial: Low is around a hundred and fifty-six controls, Moderate around three hundred and twenty-three, and High considerably more, and most of the effort is not in the control text but in continuous monitoring, which begins the day authorisation is granted and never stops. If you already hold SOC 2 or ISO 27001:2022, a meaningful share of the evidence carries across.

Why you need it

01 / 06

Why the path matters more than the controls.

01

No sponsor, no authorisation.

An agency partner willing to sponsor and issue an Authority to Operate, or a route through the FedRAMP programme office, is a precondition rather than a later step. Beginning control implementation without a credible path is the most expensive mistake available in this programme.

02

The boundary is the architecture decision.

What sits inside the authorisation boundary determines the size of everything: the control set, the assessment, the continuous monitoring burden and the cost of every future change. Leveraging an already-authorised infrastructure provider removes a great deal of it, and is usually the right design.

03

Continuous monitoring is the real commitment.

Monthly vulnerability scanning with defined remediation timelines, POA&M maintenance, annual assessment and significant change requests are permanent operating obligations. Organisations budget for the authorisation and are surprised by the year that follows it.

04

It changes how you can sell.

For US federal business, authorisation is frequently the gate rather than a differentiator, and the authorisation package can be reused by other agencies, which is what makes the investment defensible once the first sponsor is secured.

Instrument

02 / 06

Where a federal baseline meets what you already hold.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 against SOC 2 and ISO 27001, so evidence you already produce is not gathered twice.

What we deliver

03 / 06

What we deliver.

01

Path and impact-level assessment

Whether authorisation is realistically achievable for you, at which impact level, by which route, and what a sponsor will expect. An honest no at this stage is the most valuable thing we can give you.

02

Authorisation boundary definition

What is inside, what is a leveraged service from an already-authorised provider, what is external, and the data flows and interconnections that justify the line. Drawn to be defended in assessment.

03

Gap analysis against the baseline

Every control in your baseline assessed against the implementation as it exists, with the customer responsibility matrix made explicit rather than assumed.

04

Control implementation and remediation

The engineering work (FIPS-validated cryptography, boundary protection, identity and access management, audit and accountability, configuration and vulnerability management) done with your teams rather than described to them.

05

The authorisation package

System Security Plan, policies and procedures, incident response plan, configuration management plan, contingency plan and POA&M, written to describe the system as built and maintained as it changes.

06

Assessment support and continuous monitoring design

Preparation for the 3PAO security assessment, support through it, and the monthly scanning, reporting and POA&M rhythm that has to run from authorisation onwards.

How we run it

04 / 06

The engagement, step by step.

  1. 01

    Path assessment

    Impact level, sponsorship route and a realistic view of whether and when authorisation is achievable. This step can and sometimes should end the programme.

    Weeks 1-3
  2. 02

    Boundary and leverage design

    Define the authorisation boundary and decide what to inherit from an already-authorised platform rather than build and assess yourself.

    Weeks 3-6
  3. 03

    Gap analysis

    Assess the boundary against every control in the baseline and produce the remediation plan and the customer responsibility matrix.

    Months 2-3
  4. 04

    Implement

    Close the gaps and write the package alongside the engineering work, so the SSP describes the system that actually exists.

    Months 3-9
  5. 05

    Readiness review and 3PAO assessment

    A full internal review against the assessment objectives, then the independent security assessment performed by the accredited 3PAO.

    Months 9-12
  6. 06

    Authorisation and continuous monitoring

    Support the authorisation decision, then stand up monthly scanning, POA&M management and significant change reporting.

    Month 12, then monthly

Key benefits

05 / 06

What changes afterwards.

A federal market you can actually sell into

Authorisation converts an unreachable segment into a reachable one, and the package can be leveraged by further agencies rather than repeated from the beginning for each.

Engineering discipline that outlives the programme

Boundary definition, hardened baselines, comprehensive audit logging and monthly vulnerability management raise the floor of the whole service, not only the part inside the boundary.

Evidence that answers the other frameworks too

The SP 800-53 control set is a superset of much of what SOC 2 and ISO 27001 ask for, so once this is running the commercial attestations get substantially cheaper.

Tools we use

06 / 06

Named, and used on your engagement.

No “latest tech tools”. These are the ones your report will cite, alongside the manual work that a tool cannot do for you.

Standards

  • NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baselines
  • FIPS 199 and FIPS 200
  • NIST SP 800-53A

Package

  • System Security Plan
  • POA&M
  • Customer responsibility matrix
  • OSCAL-formatted deliverables

Technical validation

  • Nessus with authenticated scanning
  • Burp Suite Professional
  • Infrastructure-as-code review

Continuous monitoring

  • Monthly vulnerability scanning and reporting
  • Wazuh
  • AphelioNYX Compliance Hub

Mapping

  • 800-53 to SOC 2 and ISO 27001
  • AphelioNYX Frameworks Hub

Why Aphelion

Shared

Four things you can check.

01

The work is done by people with names.

Darshap Nayak, formerly of KPMG, holds a master’s degree in cybersecurity and more than seven years in security operations. Jaimin Somani brings fifteen-plus years of academic and hands-on VAPT. Hemang Desai is an ICT network specialist from Australia. You will meet them, not a logo.

Meet the team
02

Evidence, not adjectives.

Every finding arrives with the reproduction steps, the affected asset and the fix, ranked by what it actually reaches in your environment, not by a CVSS number copied from a scanner. You get the report and the raw output, not a summary of a summary.

See how we test
03

Two offices, one practice.

Ahmedabad and Sharjah, working the same methodology on the same tooling. Indian data-residency requirements and UAE delivery are both ordinary here, and the AphelioNYX AD Pen-Test module runs entirely inside your perimeter when regulation says it must.

The platform
04

What we will not do.

Invent a statistic to make a slide land. Publish your name as a client without written permission. Print an award badge nobody awarded. Founded in 2024. We say so, and we attribute experience to the people who have it.

Ask us anything

100+ organizations secured

Across the globe, and across eight industries. We name a client only with their written permission.

  • Finance & Banking
  • Healthcare
  • Retail & E-commerce
  • Technology
  • SaaS
  • Hospitality
  • Manufacturing
  • Pharmaceuticals

AphelioNYX is SOC 2, ISO and GDPR compliant; attestations are available on request under NDA. We would rather hand you the report than print a badge.

Questions

FAQ

Asked often enough to answer here.

Can Aphelion Cyber perform our FedRAMP assessment?
No. The security assessment must be performed by a Third Party Assessment Organisation accredited under the programme, and we are not one. Nor can we grant an authorisation. That decision belongs to a sponsoring agency or to the programme office. Our role is readiness: the boundary, the controls, the package and the preparation, so that when the 3PAO arrives the assessment confirms what you already know rather than discovering it. Keeping preparation and assessment separate is a requirement of the programme, not a preference of ours.
Do we need an agency sponsor before we start?
You need a credible path, and for most organisations that means an agency partner willing to sponsor the authorisation. Beginning heavy control implementation with no sponsor and no route through the programme office is how companies spend a great deal of money on a project with no completion criteria. There are routes that do not begin with a signed sponsorship, but all of them require a realistic view of demand for your service from federal customers, and that assessment is the first thing we do.
Which impact level applies to us?
It follows from FIPS 199 categorisation of the information the service will handle, judged on the consequences of a loss of confidentiality, integrity or availability. Most commercial SaaS offerings serving federal customers land at Moderate, which is around three hundred and twenty-three controls. Low applies to services where the impact of compromise is genuinely limited, and there is a tailored baseline for low-impact software-as-a-service. High is reserved for systems where compromise would be severe or catastrophic: law enforcement, emergency services, financial or health systems of record.
How much does SOC 2 or ISO 27001 help?
Meaningfully, but less than people hope. There is real overlap in access control, change management, incident response, risk assessment and vendor management, and the evidence-collection habits transfer well. What does not transfer is the depth and specificity: SP 800-53 Rev 5 prescribes control implementation in far more detail, requires FIPS-validated cryptography, and demands a documented authorisation boundary with an explicit customer responsibility matrix. Treat an existing attestation as a head start of perhaps a third, not as most of the work.
How long does it take, and what happens after?
Twelve to eighteen months from a standing start to authorisation is a realistic planning assumption, and the variables are sponsorship, boundary complexity and how much you inherit from an already-authorised infrastructure provider. What matters as much is what follows: continuous monitoring begins at authorisation and does not stop: monthly vulnerability scanning with defined remediation timelines, POA&M maintenance, annual assessment and a significant change request process that governs how you ship. Budget for the year after, not only the year before.

Forty-five minutes. Your environment, not a slide deck.

A personalised walkthrough and a free readiness assessment against the frameworks you are actually being asked for. Pick a time that suits you, or write to us. We reply within one business day.